Who Is David Pecker, The First Witness In The Trump Hush-Money Trial?

Who Is David Pecker, the First Witness in the Trump Hush-Money Trial?

Pecker, prosecutors are expected to argue, aided Trump in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes to bury negative stories about the then-presidential candidate as he ran for office in 2016.

David Pecker, the former president and CEO of American Media Inc., has taken the stand as the first witness in former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush-money trial

Pecker, prosecutors are expected to argue, aided Trump in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes to bury negative stories about the then-presidential candidate as he ran for office in 2016. At the center of this case, Trump is accused of falsifying business records related to reimbursement of $130,000 paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election to keep quiet about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump from years prior. (Trump has denied all wrongdoing.)

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Here’s what to know about David Pecker, the prosecution’s first witness in the historic trial

Who is David Pecker?

David Pecker is the former president and CEO of American Media Inc. (AMI), the parent company of the tabloid the National Enquirer and a longtime friend to Trump. 

Ahead of the 2016 election, Pecker met with Trump and his personal lawyer Michael Cohen with the intention of suppressing negative stories about Trump by buying the rights to the stories and refraining from publishing them, according to a 2018 non-prosecution agreement between AMI and the U.S. Department of Justice. 

How is he related to this case?

Prosecutors are expected to argue that Pecker was a key figure in the alleged scheme to pay off adult film star Stormy Daniels when she intended to go public with claims that she had an affair with Trump ahead of the 2016 election. Pecker told Trump that Daniels was looking to sell a story about the sexual encounter (which Trump denies), according to the New York Times. Soon after, Cohen reached out to Daniels offering a $130,000 payment.

Prosecutors will argue that Pecker aided Trump in numerous “catch and kill” schemes, in which the National Enquirer purchased the rights to stories but never ran them. “By paying for it, and basically having them sign a nondisclosure agreement or a contract, they were able to kill stories,” says Joel Kaplan, professor at the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. 

In one instance, Pecker and Dylan Howard, former editor-in-chief at the National Enquirer, coordinated with the Trump campaign to pay model and actress Karen McDougal $150,000 to purchase the rights to her claim that she engaged in a relationship with Trump, according to a Federal Elections Commission agreement with AMI. 

In a 2018 non-prosecution agreement, AMI admitted that the McDougal payment was “substantially more” than the company might typically pay for a story, because Trump’s lawyer Cohen had assured Pecker that AMI would be reimbursed for the payment. Cohen has said Trump brokered the McDougal deal with Pecker. Trump has denied he directed Cohen to break the law.

What could his testimony reveal?

In this case, Trump is accused of falsifying business records related to the Stormy Daniels payment in order to corrupt the 2016 election. Pecker’s testimony will be key for the prosecution to show that important information was withheld from the American public, says Kaplan.

“By entering into this catch and kill agreement, he was able to prevent the publication not just by the National Enquirer, but by anyone, of information that could have been important to the American people before they voted,” Kaplan says. “That’s the theory of the case.”

 

Get the latest work and career updates delivered straight to your inbox by subscribing to our magazine category today. Stay informed and ahead of the game with Subscrb.

News and Current Issues blogpost optin (#13)

Stay informed and up-to-date with our expert coverage of current issues. Subscribe now.

The content on this website has been curated from various sources and is for informational purposes only. We do not claim ownership of any of the content posted here, all rights belong to their respective authors. While we make every effort to ensure that the information is accurate and up-to-date, we cannot guarantee its completeness or accuracy. Any opinions or views expressed on this website are solely those of the original authors and do not necessarily represent our own. We do not endorse or take responsibility for the content or actions of external websites or individuals linked from this website. Any reliance on the information provided on this website is done at your own risk. Please note that this article was originally seen on the source website TIME, by the author Simmone Shah