No products in the cart.
American intelligence officers and Special Operations forces in Afghanistan began raising alarms as early as January, and the National Security Council convened an interagency meeting to discuss the problem and what to do about it in late March, The New York Times has previously reported. But despite being presented with options, including a diplomatic protest and sanctions, the White House authorized no response.
The administration’s explanations on Monday, in public and in private, appeared to be an attempt to placate lawmakers, particularly Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans, alarmed by news reports in recent days revealing the existence of the intelligence assessment and Mr. Trump’s insistence he had not been warned of the suspected Russian plot.
The assessments pointing to a Russian scheme to offer bounties to Taliban-linked militants and criminals were based on information collected in raids and interrogations on the ground in Afghanistan, where American military commanders came to believe Russia was behind the plot, as well as more sensitive and unspecified intelligence that came in over time, an American official said.
Officials said there was disagreement among intelligence officials about the strength of the evidence about the suspected Russian plot and the evidence linking the attack on the Marines to the suspected Russian plot, but they did not detail those disputes.
Notably, the National Security Agency, which specializes in hacking and electronic surveillance, has been more skeptical about interrogations and other human intelligence, officials said.
Typically, the president is formally briefed when the information has been vetted and seen as sufficiently credible and important by the intelligence professionals. Such information would most likely be included in the President’s Daily Brief.
Former officials said that in previous administrations, accusations of such profound importance — even if the evidence was not fully established — were conveyed to the president. “We had two threshold questions: ‘Does the president need to know this?’ and ‘Why does he need to know it now?’” said Robert Cardillo, a former senior intelligence official who briefed President Barack Obama from 2010 to 2014.
This Post was originally published on nytimes.com
Information and knowledge always help human beings to make informed and wiser decision.
Access to the top notch knowledgebase from the World Top 10 Magazine publishers – Discounted Magazine Subscription Malaysia FREE Shipping Nationwide
Bloomberg Businessweek (up to 76% OFF, from RM7.60 per issue) Get it here: https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/bloomberg-businessweek/
Fortune (up to 53% OFF, from RM12.10 per issue) Get it here;: https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/fortune/
亚州周刊 (up to 67% OFF, from RM5.25 per issue) Get it here: https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/yazhou-zhoukan/
The Economist (up to 72% OFF, from RM18.82 per issue) Get it here: https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/the-economist/
The Wall Street Journal (up to 50% OFF, from RM3.99 per issue) Get it here: https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/the-wall-street-journal/
Time (up to 52% OFF, from RM7.15 per issue) Get it here:https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/time/
Forbes Aisia (up to 23% OFF, from RM20 per issue) Get it here:https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/forbes-asia/
Reader’s Digest (English)
(up to 20% OFF, from RM12 per issue) Get it here:https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/readers-digest/
Reader’s Digest (Chinese)
(up to 20% OFF, from RM12 per issue) Get it here:https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/readers-digest-chinese/
National Geographic (up to 30% OFF, from RM18 per issue) Get it here:https://wordpress-647751-2152275.cloudwaysapps.com/product/national-geographic/
Hurry up! These deals are for limited time only ? Please visit us at subscrb.com for more info or email us [email protected]
Thank you for reading, best regards